How did Nazi perpetrators justify their behavior during the Nazi time

Order 100% Plagiarism Free Paper Now

I need an article about how former perpetrators (male and female) in 1.
NAZI concentration camps and 2. Wehrmacht / Polizeibataillon 101
(Reserve Police Battalion 101) / Einsatzgruppen der Sicherheitspolizei
und des SD (“task forces” or “deployment groups“) behaved after 1945:
How did they justify their behavior during the Nazi time? Are there
specific reasons that came up more often than others? How did they feel
working in their position? Are there differences between men and women?
Are there differences concerning their former position (commanders,
administrativ stuff, guards, driver etc.)? Did their reasons change from
the beginning to now?

The article should range from the time after the end of the Third Reich
and should end today, as there were several trials in the past years
(f.e. Demjanjuk, Oskar Gröning, Klaus K. in Ascq, France)

How did Nazi perpetrators justify their behavior during the Nazi time

Order 100% Plagiarism Free Paper Now

As I don’t know about the amount of literature which should better be
used in such an article I guess the minimum of used sources should be 8
(min. 4 books).

The article should be about 3.850 words as I am going to expand this
article to a whole chapter. So if you could put some hints into the foot
notes where to find more information or evidence, that would be great.

You can divide the article into to parts: 1. Concentration camp und 2.
Wehrmacht / Polizeibataillon 101 (Reserve Police Battalion 101) /
Einsatzgruppen der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD (“task forces” or
“deployment groups“).

How did Nazi perpetrators justify their behavior during the Nazi time

Order 100% Plagiarism Free Paper Now