Article Critique Moving to Opportunity MTO

Article Critique Moving to Opportunity MTO

Order 100% plagiarism free essay on Article Critique

Article Critique Moving to Opportunity (MTO). To start with the article by Chetty, Hendren and Katz (2016) sounds informative but the structure is not just disoriented and unscholarly but also makes it confusing to the audience. The first section in italics is supposed to be the abstract but there’s no indication to demonstrate that. The second paragraph is also supposed to be the introduction but does not highlight this fact. In short, the abstract and introduction appear less like paragraphs that lack a coherent transition. A scholarly abstract, should be brief, well-structured abstract and includes critical elements such as objectives, methodology, results and conclusion. Since these elements are lacking in the supposed abstract, the article does not fit the description of a scholarly journal. Moreover, an abstract is pertinent because it enables the audience to grasp what the article is about. While the introduction as presented highlights the problem statement by citing just how underdeveloped neighborhoods can impact economic status, health and academic outcomes of young adults aged 21 and above. It is also appropriate that the authors represented the goal of Moving to Opportunity (MTO) at the outset.

 

Article Critique Moving to Opportunity MTO

Order 100% plagiarism free essay on Article Critique

The essay will critique the abstract and introduction, summary, key points in the discussion, strengths and weakness of arguments in the presented data, recommendations, suggestions for further research and conclusion. However, contrary to the assertions by Bammer (2018) that the introduction should create the first impression of credibility, the introduction in this article is quite lengthy and muddled up.  Moreover, an exceptional introduction, presents the topic first by creating some context and background. Chetty, Hendren and Katz (2016) needed to tell the audience about the study and how it would be carried out. Moreover, the authors were required to state the rationale for the study, substantiate why the study is vital. Stating the proposition was also warranted yet the authors did not bother to highlight. At this point, one cannot tell whether or not this is an introduction, literature review, methodology, findings or the analysis section because all these themes are mixed up. Articles that demonstrate scholarship should be structured methodically and orderly, this makes the audience to follow through. Again, the authors used lengthy wordings, which also made the article complex for the audience to scan through. The writing style was equally inappropriate for this article, because the footnotes occupied three quarters of a page, the reader could easily plunge into the footnote section; hence lose sight of the main content.

Article Critique Moving to Opportunity MTO

Order 100% plagiarism free essay on Article Critique

By explanation, a summary is a brief proclamation or narrative of the main points in a write-up. The article by Chetty, Hendren and Katz (2016), lacks a summary. This creates an impression that the authors did not comprehend the content of the article and cannot therefore communicate the message effectively to the audience. In this article, for instance, you only come across the phrase summary in the last paragraph of what is supposed to be the introduction on page 860; this is right before the heading moving to opportunity experiment. Based on the paragraph, section one is a summary of the main features of MTO experiment while section two is represents the summary of statistics and tests. This is confusing to the reader whether novice or expert.

While a great summary provides an objective outline of the entire study, this article lacks any meaningful summary, hence fails to respond to the underlying question of who did what, where and when.  Moreover, the whole paper is disjointed not because the authors have failed to present the main idea of each section, but rather because evidence to support the notion seems fleeting. Though the authors are quite knowledge per se, a lot of concreate evident and data was poured into this write-up, however, the manner in which the article is presented appears to have been written for their own reference. One would imagine that this article was not meant for dissemination. This assumption also corroborates with the notion that not all published articles are outstanding. According to Sanders et al. (2016) a good summary contracts the original version of the article. Fundamentally, the article should be quite elaborate when it comes to capturing pertinent information.

Key points in the text for discussion

Article Critique Moving to Opportunity MTO

Order 100% plagiarism free essay on Article Critique

The discussion section responds to the research questions in a persuasive way. A notable element in this study is demonstrated in the way the researcher presented their narrative in the discussion section. The discussion chapter is quite articulate. Moreover, the study uses a plethora of existing knowledge to justify the findings. This is especially, superb when presenting a discussion chapter. One of the key points in the discussion is where the authors present findings that children who shifted to a lower-poverty background at their tender age, are highly likely to join college and accrue higher income as adults.

Moreover, findings have been demonstrated that these children end up living in well-to-do backgrounds as adults hence less likely to become single parents per se. Moreover, a considerable segment of the systematic disparities in economic upshots across documented regions can be quantified by the causal effects of neighborhoods.  The study also determined that since MTO does not have impact on adults, the neighborhood influences children in their formative years. Findings in this study are also in tandem with other studies that delve on the immigrant adaptation to understand the effect of childhood exposure (van den Berg et al. 2014).

Article Critique Moving to Opportunity MTO

The study also established that MTO had negligible impact on adult’s financial outcomes. Nevertheless, moving to lower-poverty settings had negative bearing on older youth. These findings are also supported by different child development studies, which report strong associations between the period of exposure to high-paucity background and resulting effects. Studies also indicate that ecological circumstances during childhood especially before the age of five have lasting impact on children as they mature into adults as opposed to conditions later on in life (Shonkoff and Phillips 2000). Although MTO treatment improved the short-term outcomes of children, the effect diminishes in about 10 years only for the gains to re-surface in adulthood as quantified by earnings and college education accomplishments.

In this respect, the authors were not just confident with their findings but also offers evident that contradicts finding with concrete evidence. Although findings can help to resolve some central findings on the effect of neighborhoods on the wellbeing of a child in their adulthood, other strands of knowledge are subject for debate.

Article Critique Moving to Opportunity MTO

Order 100% plagiarism free essay on Article Critique

Conclusion and Recommendations

The goal of a conclusion is to help readers understand the topic. Moreover, the conclusion provides a summary of major points and recommendations. Therefore, the authors presented a conclusion restating how better and poor background impact the overall development of children. However, evidence shows that a good conclusion should summarise the paper in a well-organised manner instead of reaffirming the purpose statement. While the authors presented a substantive conclusion, they forgot to discuss the recommendations.

In any given study, recommendations are critical propositions about the suitable course of action (Velte and Stawinoga 2017). The recommendations provide a guide for addressing certain issues and contribute to beneficial results. Regardless of the importance of recommendations, Chetty, Hendren and Katz (2016) do not provide recommendations of their study. In this respect, the article lacks actions to be taken into account to enhance the impacts of the MTO experiment on children’s long-term outcomes. The authors could have presented suggestions to be initiated based on practice, or theory to improve children outcomes in the low –income families.

Besides, a good article should have areas for future work. Nonetheless, this is something that the authors did not take into consideration. Haruna and Ismail (2016) allege that future research area is integrated with the limitations section. This helps to get suggestions for future research.

Article Critique Moving to Opportunity MTO

Order 100% plagiarism free essay on Article Critique

Get a 20 % discount on an
order above $ 120
Use the following coupon code :
today2015

error: Content is protected !!