Is sympathetic or cathartic violence edifying in a way that entertaining
violence isn’t?

Order 100% plagiarism free paper now

Questions to consider may include, but are not limited to the following:
Were you aware of the more restrictive ratings given to films featuring
sexuality compared to violence? Is the normalization of violence,
compared to the taboo nature of consenting sexuality, problematic?
Do you know anyone who is more uncomfortable with displays of affection
or sex than violence?
Can you think of recent film experiences that shows how some are more
concerned with sex compared to violence?
What do you think about how the treatment of sex and violence in the
ratings system? Should it be changed, and if so, how so?
Should all sex be treated the same in a given rating system?
How does the more restrictive treatment of sex compared to violence
relate to the idea of cultural hegemony?

Is sympathetic or cathartic violence edifying in a way that entertaining
violence isn’t?

Should consensual, sexually explicit content be given more restrictive
ratings than violent content?
Is media violence a serious issue we should concern ourselves with?
Given the impact advertisement has on consumption—our consumer
choices—on what grounds can we say that entertainment media has no or
limited influence on society?
Should all forms of violence be treated the same? What are the
differences between representations of violence and why do those
differences matter or not matter?
Should bloodless violence receive more restrictive or less restrictive
ratings than real-life portrayals of violence? What about entertaining
portrayals of violence?
Is sympathetic or cathartic violence edifying in a way that entertaining
violence isn’t? Should the two be rated the same?

Is sympathetic or cathartic violence edifying in a way that entertaining
violence isn’t?

Order 100% plagiarism free paper now