Guaranteed Success
First Class Honours
Factors that contributed to Israel-Palestinian conflict
Factors that contributed to Israel-Palestinian conflict
Order 100% plagiarism free dissertation now
Sirgy et al. contends that while the genesis of the Israel-Palestine antagonism is not evident in any antique contests between the lineage of Ishmael and Isaac, modern day conflict between this two people is a nineteenth century imperialistic racism towards the Jews, also known as anti-Semitism. On the contrary, Abu Libdeh, Ovensen and Brunborg, affirm that the Israel-Palestine gridlock originates from conceptual, historical, sacred and opinionated differences with roots dating back to ancient times. The view is affirmed by Shifir in indicating that at the center of the current conflict are two peoples – Jews and Arabs that jostle for settlement and political autonomy over the same land.
Historically, the Jews people were scattered around the world in parts of Europe, some lived in Palestine, others in Iraq, Damascus and Turkey’s Istanbul. Nonetheless, Quigley affirms that the Jews motivation to migrate to Palestine was coerced from without. Towards the brink of the nineteenth century, for instance, anti-Semitism had reached its peak in most parts of Europe. According to Davidson, the anti-Jews voices would propel the Jews people towards self-determination as the only solution against the shocking hate. Many voices would then emerge such as Zionism, to champion for the establishment of the state of Israel. Just like Davidson, Shipler notes that the Jewish and Arab national movements presented new figurative implications, augmented new combative frameworks to age old discrepancies, and hence cemented mutual resentment making solutions intricate. These assertions are echoed by Davis who contends that the Jewish National Fund (JNF) embarked on an expansive mission of buying land in readiness to settle the Jews as early as 1907.
Factors that contributed to Israel-Palestinian conflict
Order 100% plagiarism free dissertation now
Nevertheless, Abu Libdeh recounts that although this would seem an impossible fete for the Jews, especially with over 500,000 indigenous Palestinians under the Ottoman Empire, the World Zionism Organization (WSO) sought from Britain to support its objective in establishing a Jewish nation. Fundamentally, Turnberg indicates that the Balfour Declaration, advanced by Britain would necessitate support for the establishment of Israel within what was previously conceived to be Palestine territory.
Amidst international support, all these variables instigated the immigration of the Jewish to Palestine; an aspect was a recipe for Israel-Palestine conflict. Though the second wave of Israel-Palestine conflict emerged after the World War holocaust in 1947, Imseis highlights that it was the implementation of resolution 181 by the United Nations in a bid to subdivide Palestine that blow things out of proportion. Essentially, this saw Israel allocated 55 percent of Palestine land while boarders were left underacted. On the contrary, Gordon posits that the Jewish leadership did not foresee the survival of the Jewish in such a hostile neighborhood, an issue that compelled them to uproot more than 700,000 Palestinians from their land.
Imseis reiterates that it was the declaration of the state of Israel in 1948 that degenerated into a full-scale war initiated by Arab nations such as Egypt, Syria, Lebanon and Jordan against Israel. As a frame of reference, the notion is espoused by Rossinow, who allege that the third wave of Israel-Palestine conflict commenced in June 1967, after Israel emerged the victor in a 6-Day War. After defeating a host of Arab nations in a span of 6 days, Israel pushed its adversaries inward on all sides, while captured East Jerusalem and embarked on the occupation of West Bank and Gaza, Golan and Sinai. The occupation would see an addition of 1.5 million Arabs under Israeli’s control.
Factors that contributed to Israel-Palestinian conflict
Order 100% plagiarism free dissertation now
But again, one would question why the United Nations (UN), an organization that emerged from the rabbles of the second world war, has not been able to live up to its obligations, such as preventing wars from taking root. Nonetheless, the fact that the Arab-Israel conflict broke out following the establishment of UN, casts into aspersion the legitimacy of the UN. Although countries have refuted the argument of Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel more than five decades since capturing the city in 1967, the United States and Russia recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital city. According to Whitelam, nations opposed to Israel’s claim envelop their displeasure in Israel’s disregard for international law. That same position is supported by Reich and Powers in asserting that Israel’s capture of Jerusalem from Jordan contravenes international law, which outlaws that capture of capture of foreign land.
In contrast, a monograph by Della Pergola shows that Israel has binding and legitimate status in Jerusalem. In addition, the monograph indicates that while faced with aggression from Jordan and other neighboring nations, Israel had no choice but to control the territory to defend itself. Sofaer, who argues that self-defense is a lawful motivation in using military power to secure one’s territory as promised by international law is in support of the previous contention. Seemingly, Tiripelli indicates that Israel too enjoyed support from the West and also through its mass media. For instance, one would be mesmerized by the enthusiasm surrounding Israel, with phrases that appear inconceivable currently.
While the role played by media is highlighted by Bourdon, as evidenced by the Tribune paper of 1951 in an article that recounted the Israel miracle, this claim has also been refuted since it validates the coldblooded policy. Aron, too affirm that many nations and their instruments of communication were also opposed to the miracle adage. That alone saw Israel relegated to a xenophobic nation that had no devout standing.
